Although Kim remains the unquestioned face of the regime, analysts point to a subtle but significant shift in the country's power structure. In recent months, key figures within the Workers' Party of Korea and the military have taken on increasingly visible roles, prompting speculation that decision-making authority is being distributed more widely — or at least more strategically.
Among the most prominent is Kim Yo-jong, the leader's younger sister, who continues to expand her influence across political, military, and diplomatic spheres. Often referred to as the regime's chief enforcer and propagandist, she has issued fiery statements aimed at South Korea, the U.S., and Japan, signaling her growing role in shaping North Korea’s external messaging.
“Kim Yo-jong’s tone and visibility suggest she’s not just speaking on behalf of her brother — she may be shaping policy behind the scenes,” said Lee Jung-hoon, a North Korea analyst at Seoul’s Asan Institute for Policy Studies.
Also rising in prominence is Jo Yong-won, a senior official who has frequently appeared alongside Kim during inspections and state meetings. He is believed to be responsible for overseeing the implementation of domestic policies and ensuring political discipline among the elite.
Meanwhile, Pak Jong-chon, a top military commander, has reemerged after a brief political eclipse. His presence at several high-level weapons tests in 2025 has fueled speculation that he now plays a crucial role in North Korea’s military decisions.
Despite these developments, most experts agree that Kim Jong-un remains at the center of power, albeit with possible adjustments to how that power is exercised. Rather than a loss of control, some analysts believe this could be a tactical delegation of authority, aimed at stabilizing the regime and preparing for potential succession scenarios.
“Kim likely remains the ultimate decision-maker,” said Dr. Benjamin Katz, a researcher with the International Crisis Group. “But the regime seems to be experimenting with a more diversified model of control — at least within the inner circle.”
Such shifts are difficult to confirm. North Korea's extreme secrecy makes it nearly impossible to determine the true chain of command. Most information comes from defectors, intelligence reports, satellite imagery, and state media analysis — each with its limitations.
Still, the question remains: if something were to happen to Kim, who would lead?
With no confirmed successor and power concentrated within a dynastic elite, the stability of North Korea hinges not only on Kim Jong-un’s health and authority, but also on the loyalty and maneuvering of those now working just beneath him.
For now, the world watches — and wonders — who’s really running North Korea.